background

Manufacturing Data Integration Services for Real-Time Operations

Your plant already produces the data you need — it just lives in systems never built to talk to each other. We connect them into one trusted, real-time foundation, so you see every plant’s live state on one screen instead of next-day reports. We pick the stack to fit your workload — Databricks or Snowflake, lakehouse or warehouse — never a vendor partnership.

Let's talk
100+
software engineers
15+
years industry experience
$1 - 100 bln
working with clients having
Fortune 500
clients served

We are trusted by global market leaders

Logo PricewaterhouseCoopers
Logo Kimberly-Clark
Logo UnipolSai
Logo VORYS
Logo Cambridge University Press
Logo Columbia University in the City of New York
Logo Cosnova
Essence logo
Logo catrice
Logo Coupang

Our Manufacturing Data Integration Services

Manufacturing data integration services connect ERP, MES, SCADA, PLC, and IoT sensor data into one governed foundation that BI, analytics, and AI all read from.

Unlike a generic iPaaS or one-off integration — which assume clean, documented sources — this is built for plant reality: proprietary protocols, undocumented controller logic, and aging equipment that off-the-shelf connectors stall on.

ERP & Business Systems

ERP, finance, and planning records become a live part of every dashboard, not a nightly export.

Shop-Floor & Sensor Data

Machine, sensor, and equipment data in one place, so the floor and the boardroom read the same numbers.

Warehouse & Lakehouse

We design the warehouse or data lake layer your analytics sit on — matched to your workload, not a vendor default.

BI-Ready Data Layer

Our business intelligence team builds one semantic layer your dashboards read from, so leadership’s numbers come from one definition, not five.

Real-Time Pipelines

Streaming and batch pipelines built as production systems — retries, validation, monitoring — so one bad batch never takes the feed down.

Quality & Governance

Our data governance work validates every record before load, catching the failures specific to plant data — and keeps lineage and access under control as you scale.

Manufacturing Data Integration Use Cases

Most manufacturers arrive with one of these scenarios already blocking a decision. Each is a job the integrated foundation turns from a manual scramble into routine.

Real-Time Plant Performance and OEE Reporting

Performance and OEE only reflect reality when machine, line, and shift data land in one model as events happen — not in a spreadsheet assembled the next morning. We stream shop-floor signals into one governed layer so a supervisor reads live plant performance inside the shift that creates it.

Predictive Maintenance and Asset Health Monitoring

Predictive maintenance stalls at the data step far more often than the model step. The integration layer feeds clean, lineage-tracked machine and sensor signals into the foundation asset-health models that depend on — your data-science team trains on it, or we co-develop. We own the data foundation; the model layer sits on top of it.

Quality Analytics and Defect Traceability

A defect is only traceable when every reading is tied back to its source — the machine, the line, the timestamp it actually came from. When the integration layer preserves that lineage end to end, quality analytics run on a clean chain from sensor to report instead of a reconstruction pieced together after the fact.

Multi-Plant KPI Standardization

When every plant defines “yield,” “uptime,” or “scrap” in its own way, leadership is comparing numbers that were never the same measurement. We map each site’s source of truth, then build one shared semantic layer so every plant and shift report is mapped into one set of definitions — so a cross-plant comparison finally measures the same thing on every site.

Supply Chain, Inventory, and Warehouse Visibility

Sell-through, inventory, and supplier files usually arrive as separate exports stitched together by hand — slow, and a source of the errors that later break a report. We bring those feeds into one model and reconcile them automatically, so inventory and supply-chain views reflect what is actually on the floor rather than last week’s manual roll-up.

Energy, Sustainability, and Equipment Utilization Tracking

Energy, emissions, and utilization reporting only works when environmental and equipment telemetry sit in the same governed model as production data. Once those feeds are integrated and lineage-tracked, utilization and sustainability metrics come from the same trusted source as every other KPI — no separate, hand-built reconciliation each reporting cycle.

M&A and Acquired Plant Data Consolidation

An acquisition that bolts on a second ERP and a different MES creates an overnight integration gap — two finance teams, two definitions of every KPI, no single P&L. We map a source of truth per plant, then fold the acquired site into one shared semantic layer, so it reports into the parent model without re-platforming either side.

background
background

Get a Free Integration Audit

Send us your top systems and the report that hurts most. Within a week, you get a map of how your sources connect today, the smallest first step that creates value, and a scope for the rest — no charge, no commitment.

Talk to us:
Write to us:
Contact Us

Technologies and Systems We Integrate

Integration Method

Typical Integration Problem:

GroupBWT Integration:

ERP & Business — ERP, finance, planning

Nightly exports put yesterday's numbers in today's meeting

Change tracking and managed connectors keep ERP records live in every dashboard

Machine & Controller — PLCs and SCADA, legacy and modern

Proprietary protocols and undocumented logic turn each line into another point database

OPC-UA, Modbus, and MQTT through edge gateways, sub-minute streaming

Sensor & Telemetry — production-line, equipment, GPS

Sensor data trapped on the floor; downtime traced after the shift, not during it

Downtime caught during the shift, not at next-day standup — event-driven queues at five-second cadence, full lineage sensor to report

Warehouse & Supply — sell-through, inventory, supplier files

Analysts spend hours stitching files by hand while errors creep in

Parallel loading with a validation framework that checks every file before load

Acquired Plants & Legacy Estates — different ERP, MES, and reporting standards from M&A

Two finance teams, two definitions of "yield," no single number leadership can trust

Source-of-truth mapping per plant, then one shared semantic layer — the acquired site reports into the parent model without re-platforming either side

ERP & Business — ERP, finance, planning

Typical Integration Problem

GroupBWT Integration

Machine & Controller — PLCs and SCADA, legacy and modern

Typical Integration Problem

GroupBWT Integration

Sensor & Telemetry — production-line, equipment, GPS

Typical Integration Problem

GroupBWT Integration

Warehouse & Supply — sell-through, inventory, supplier files

Typical Integration Problem

GroupBWT Integration

Acquired Plants & Legacy Estates — different ERP, MES, and reporting standards from M&A

Typical Integration Problem

GroupBWT Integration

How Our Manufacturing Data Integration Process Works

01/04

Integration audit

We inventory every system and report your teams depend on, then name the first integration that unblocks the most value.

Architecture design

We design the target around your workload, your team's skills, and your cost model — not a vendor partnership. Lakehouse, warehouse, or hybrid is a call we make after the audit, not before.

Build, test, validate

Pipelines built as production systems — retries, monitoring, and a validation framework that checks every record before load.

Deploy, monitor, optimize

We run the new platform beside the old and cut over only after validation, so every report survives the switch, and no leadership dashboard goes dark mid-migration.
01/04

Why Choose GroupBWT for Manufacturing Data Integration

Our strongest manufacturing-adjacent work spans heavy equipment, multi-site industrial production, consumer goods, and supply chain — different products, identical integration problems: legacy controllers, undocumented logic, and machine streams that must join business records.

Coordination

Plant operations and reporting read from one model, so the floor and head office stop arguing over spreadsheets. For a multi-site industrial producer, we mapped a 6,000-table legacy warehouse and 20+ disconnected systems across 12 sites into one governed lakehouse design — so every site and shift works from one set of figures, without breaking a report they trust.

Modernization

A staged data warehouse migration: the new platform runs beside the old, and we retire the old only after validation — production reports preserved at every step.

One Team, One Stack

The same engineers own integration, warehouse, BI, and AI-ready data, so when a number looks wrong, there is no finger-pointing between vendors. One team on the whole stack also means leaner support — a change ripples through in one pass, not three change requests across three vendors.

Vendor-Neutral by Design

Big consultancies and platform partners lead with Snowflake, Databricks, SAP, or Fabric because that is what they sell. We choose the stack after we see your workload — what your reports need, what your controllers speak, what your team can run — not a sales quota.

Built for Your Plant

We fit the system to real constraints — messy legacy systems, low-bandwidth sites, strict audit needs, aging controllers — not a template.

Proven at Scale

For a heavy-equipment fleet, operators see asset status the moment it changes — a live map refreshing 50+ assets at five-second cadence. For a multi-site industrial producer, we are unifying minute-level PLC streams into a Databricks lakehouse with Unity Catalog lineage, so supervisors act on plant events the same shift, not the next morning.

AI-Ready by Default

The integration layer we build is the foundation AI depends on — clean, lineage-tracked data ready for model training, anomaly detection, and predictive maintenance. Most AI projects stall at the data step, not the model, so we make that step solid; your team builds on it, or we co-develop.

Long-Term Partner

We have run mission-critical platforms for three years and counting with a European cosmetics manufacturer, and for seven years with a supply-chain data operation serving Tier-1 retailers and brands.

background

Start Connecting Your Manufacturing Data Ecosystem

Whether you are modernizing legacy systems, wiring up plant-floor data, or building an AI-ready foundation, GroupBWT is a manufacturing data integration provider built for asset-heavy operations. Tell us your top systems and the decision you cannot make fast enough, and we will scope the manufacturing data integration solutions that get you there.

Our partnerships and awards

G2 Winter 2026 Leader
G2 Fall 2025 High Performer
Clutch 2026 Top Big Data Marketing Company
Clutch 2026 Top B2B Big Data Company
Clutch 2026 Top Power BI & Data Solutions Company
Award from Goodfirms
GroupBWT recognized as TechBehemoths awards 2024 winner in Web Design, UK
GroupBWT recognized as TechBehemoths awards 2024 winner in Branding, UK
GroupBWT received a high rating from TrustRadius in 2020
GroupBWT ranked highest in the software development companies category by SOFTWAREWORLD
ITfirms

What Our Clients Say

Inga B.

What do you like best?

Their deep understanding of our needs and how to craft a solution that provides more opportunities for managing our data. Their data solution, enhanced with AI features, allows us to easily manage diverse data sources and quickly get actionable insights from data.

What do you dislike?

It took some time to align the a multi-source data scraping platform functionality with our specific workflows. But we quickly adapted and the final result fully met our requirements.

Catherine I.

What do you like best?

It was incredible how they could build precisely what we wanted. They were genuine experts in data scraping; project management was also great, and each phase of the project was on time, with quick feedback.

What do you dislike?

We have no comments on the work performed.

Susan C.

What do you like best?

GroupBWT is the preferred choice for competitive intelligence through complex data extraction. Their approach, technical skills, and customization options make them valuable partners. Nevertheless, be prepared to invest time in initial solution development.

What do you dislike?

GroupBWT provided us with a solution to collect real-time data on competitor micro-mobility services so we could monitor vehicle availability and locations. This data has given us a clear view of the market in specific areas, allowing us to refine our operational strategy and stay competitive.

Pavlo U

What do you like best?

The company's dedication to understanding our needs for collecting competitor data was exemplary. Their methodology for extracting complex data sets was methodical and precise. What impressed me most was their adaptability and collaboration with our team, ensuring the data was relevant and actionable for our market analysis.

What do you dislike?

Finding a downside is challenging, as they consistently met our expectations and provided timely updates. If anything, I would have appreciated an even more detailed roadmap at the project's outset. However, this didn't hamper our overall experience.

Verified User in Computer Software

What do you like best?

GroupBWT excels at providing tailored data scraping solutions perfectly suited to our specific needs for competitor analysis and market research.

What do you dislike?

Given the complexity and customization of our project, we later decided that we needed a few additional sources after the project had started.

Verified User in Computer Software

What do you like best?

What we liked most was how GroupBWT created a flexible system that efficiently handles large amounts of data. Their innovative technology and expertise helped us quickly understand market trends and make smarter decisions.

What do you dislike?

The entire process was easy and fast, so there were no downsides.

Inga B.

What do you like best?

Their deep understanding of our needs and how to craft a solution that provides more opportunities for managing our data. Their data solution, enhanced with AI features, allows us to easily manage diverse data sources and quickly get actionable insights from data.

What do you dislike?

It took some time to align the a multi-source data scraping platform functionality with our specific workflows. But we quickly adapted and the final result fully met our requirements.

Catherine I.

What do you like best?

It was incredible how they could build precisely what we wanted. They were genuine experts in data scraping; project management was also great, and each phase of the project was on time, with quick feedback.

What do you dislike?

We have no comments on the work performed.

Susan C.

What do you like best?

GroupBWT is the preferred choice for competitive intelligence through complex data extraction. Their approach, technical skills, and customization options make them valuable partners. Nevertheless, be prepared to invest time in initial solution development.

What do you dislike?

GroupBWT provided us with a solution to collect real-time data on competitor micro-mobility services so we could monitor vehicle availability and locations. This data has given us a clear view of the market in specific areas, allowing us to refine our operational strategy and stay competitive.

Pavlo U

What do you like best?

The company's dedication to understanding our needs for collecting competitor data was exemplary. Their methodology for extracting complex data sets was methodical and precise. What impressed me most was their adaptability and collaboration with our team, ensuring the data was relevant and actionable for our market analysis.

What do you dislike?

Finding a downside is challenging, as they consistently met our expectations and provided timely updates. If anything, I would have appreciated an even more detailed roadmap at the project's outset. However, this didn't hamper our overall experience.

Verified User in Computer Software

What do you like best?

GroupBWT excels at providing tailored data scraping solutions perfectly suited to our specific needs for competitor analysis and market research.

What do you dislike?

Given the complexity and customization of our project, we later decided that we needed a few additional sources after the project had started.

Verified User in Computer Software

What do you like best?

What we liked most was how GroupBWT created a flexible system that efficiently handles large amounts of data. Their innovative technology and expertise helped us quickly understand market trends and make smarter decisions.

What do you dislike?

The entire process was easy and fast, so there were no downsides.

FAQ

What systems are integrated in manufacturing data integration?

It connects everything that runs the plant and the business — ERP, finance, and planning; MES, SCADA, and PLCs on the floor; IoT and machine sensors; warehouse, inventory, and supplier files; quality and maintenance records — into one trusted source the floor and the office both read from. The hard part is rarely the modern tools; it’s the aging controllers, proprietary protocols, and undocumented logic that off-the-shelf connectors stall on.

What is the difference between manufacturing data integration and manufacturing analytics?

Integration is the foundation; analytics is what you build on top. Integration pulls data from every plant system into one clean, trusted source; analytics turns that source into dashboards, KPIs, and forecasts. Built on un-integrated data, analytics inherits every silo underneath it — so the integration layer decides whether the numbers can be trusted at all.

How does ERP, MES, and SCADA integration work?

Each layer speaks its own language: ERP and MES hold business and production records, while SCADA and PLCs emit machine signals over protocols like OPC-UA, Modbus, and MQTT. We pull the machine layer through edge gateways, streaming in under a minute, capture ERP and MES changes through managed connectors, and land it all in one governed model with full lineage from sensor to report. Every record is checked on the way in, so a missed reading or duplicate timestamp can’t quietly corrupt a number downstream.

What is real-time manufacturing data integration?

It means plant events reach your dashboards as they happen — through streaming pipelines, not a nightly export. A supervisor can act on a machine event during the same shift, instead of reading about it the next morning. We build these pipelines as real production systems, with retries, validation, and room for load spikes, so one bad batch never takes the feed down.

How does manufacturing data integration support predictive maintenance?

Predictive maintenance needs a steady, trustworthy stream of machine and sensor data tied back to its source — and that’s what the integration layer produces. We deliver that clean, lineage-tracked foundation; your data-science team trains the models on it, or we build them together. We own the data layer end to end; the models sit on top.

How does integrated manufacturing data support AI?

AI is only as reliable as the data under it. Once plant-floor and business data are unified, cleaned, and lineage-tracked, that foundation is ready to train models — anomaly detection, forecasting, predictive maintenance — with no fresh data-prep scramble for each project. The model earns trust because it learns from numbers the business already trusts.

How long does a manufacturing data integration project take?

It depends on how many systems you have, how old they are, and how well documented — but the shape is the same every time. We start with an audit, then connect the systems that unblock the most value first, so you see a result early instead of at the end of a long program. Old systems migrate in parallel and we retire them only after validation, so reporting never goes dark mid-project. We commit to a timeline once the audit shows what’s really there.

What affects the cost of manufacturing data integration services?

Cost tracks complexity, not a price list: how many systems, how many are old or undocumented, the data volume and speed you need, and how much governance the work takes. A four-system batch job and a 20-system real-time platform are worlds apart. We quote after the audit, so the number fits your actual estate — and that first audit is free.

How is this different from a tool like Informatica or Boomi?

Those are platforms you still design, run, and maintain yourself; we deliver the outcome — architecture, pipelines, and the people who operate them. A generic iPaaS assumes clean, documented sources, so on a plant floor it stalls on the proprietary protocols, undocumented logic, and aging controllers we are built to handle. And we are not tied to one platform — we pick Databricks, Snowflake, a lakehouse, or a plain warehouse to fit your workload, not because we resell it.

Why GroupBWT and not a big consultancy or local integrator?

Consultancies bill for headcount and hand the build to rotating juniors; local integrators rarely stay past go-live. One senior team designs, builds, and keeps running your platform, so the knowledge stays with your data, not with a contractor who leaves. If something breaks, you reach the engineers who designed it, not a ticket queue.

Where do we start if we have 20 systems and no documentation?

That is exactly what we are built for: dozens of systems, often 10 to 15 years old, with custom extensions and undocumented logic. We start with an inventory — every source mapped before we touch it — so you see what you have and where the risk sits, then pick the first integration that unblocks the most value. From there we migrate legacy ERP, MES, and SCADA in parallel and retire them only after validation, so reporting never breaks mid-modernization.

Do you support real-time manufacturing data integration?

Yes. In production today, a live operations map we built refreshes a heavy-equipment fleet’s 50+ assets at five-second cadence, so operators see a machine’s status the moment it changes. We are rolling out sub-five-minute PLC streaming across a 12-site lakehouse so supervisors act on plant events inside the shift, not the next morning. The cadence is set by the decision — a safety interlock needs sub-second, an OEE dashboard does not — and we engineer fault tolerance and load-spike headroom into both.

background